Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Colorado) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 130 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Colorado uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |