Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 79 NM less than Ford Ranger.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
10.5
8.9
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:
74 litres
70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
700 km in combined cycle
780 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway
890 km on highway
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Dimensions
Length:
5.26 m
5.08 m
Width:
1.74 m
1.72 m
Height:
1.66 m
1.62 m
Chevrolet Colorado is larger. Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:
645 litres
1500 litres
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Colorado has 855 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. This could mean that the Chevrolet Colorado uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
