Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi L 200 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Colorado also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 5.3 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 305 HP | 136 - 168 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 434 NM | 314 - 402 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.7 | 8.6 - 9.5 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
| |