Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 5.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 305 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 434 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.7 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Colorado petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Colorado is larger. Chevrolet Colorado is 78 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Colorado has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Colorado has 232 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |