Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 297 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |