Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 129 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 294 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |