Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 23 HP more power than Fiat Freemont, but torque is 99 NM less than Fiat Freemont. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Captiva is 22 cm shorter than the Fiat Freemont, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1461 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Fiat Freemont has more luggage space (by 48 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 116 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Freemont, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |