Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 14 HP more power than Fiat Freemont, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Fiat Freemont. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Captiva is 22 cm shorter than the Fiat Freemont, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1461 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Fiat Freemont has more luggage space (by 48 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 116 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Freemont, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |