Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 169 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1455 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC60 has more luggage space (by 18 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 122 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |