Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 7 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 4 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`304 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |