Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 63 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.4 | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 112 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`329 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |