Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Mazda CX-7 2007

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Mazda CX-7
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 230 HP260 HP
Torque: 297 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds7.9 seconds
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.511.0
Real fuel consumption: 13.2 l/100km11.8 l/100km
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway820 km on highway
490 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.68 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.76 m1.64 m
Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 465 litres455 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 465 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 465 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
930 litres774 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 10 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 156 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4402`301
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 46003400
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda CX-7 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv