Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 63 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |