Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 34 HP less power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Citroen C-Crosser. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Crosser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 281 litres). In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 24 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 756 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |