Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Mazda CX-7 2007

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Mazda CX-7
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP260 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds7.9 seconds
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.711.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km11.8 l/100km
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway820 km on highway
640 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.68 m
Width: 1.85 m1.87 m
Height: 1.72 m1.64 m
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 465 litres455 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 465 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 465 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
930 litres774 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 10 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 156 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`301
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 44003600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Captiva has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda CX-7 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv