Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 69 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 774 litres | |
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 10 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 156 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`301 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |