Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 227 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 77 HP less power than Opel Antara, but torque is 23 NM more than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Captiva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 6 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Opel Antara has
| |