Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva and Opel Antara have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 6 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1420 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 95 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Antara (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Opel Antara has
| |