Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |