Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 76 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |