Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Kia Sorento 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Sorento, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sorento, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 890 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 890 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1900 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Kia Sorento has more luggage space (by 425 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 970 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chevrolet Captiva has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sorento has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Chevrolet Captiva, so Chevrolet Captiva quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |