Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 422 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 47 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller. Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 63 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |