Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 90 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi A5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1560 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Audi Q5 has more luggage space (by 75 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 630 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |