Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Captiva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva and Peugeot 4007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space (by 45 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 756 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |