Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mazda CX-7 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 258 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 288 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Mazda CX-7. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.4 | |
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 69 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Captiva and Mazda CX-7 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 774 litres | |
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`352 | 2`099 | |
Safety: | |||
Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |