Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mazda CX-7 2011

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2011 - 2013
Mazda CX-7
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 258 HP163 HP
Torque: 288 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds10.3 seconds
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Mazda CX-7. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.79.4
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway910 km on highway
Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.68 m
Width: 1.85 m1.87 m
Height: 1.73 m1.65 m
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Captiva and Mazda CX-7 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 477 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1577 litres774 litres
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Captiva has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`3522`099
Safety:
Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 70006400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Captiva has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
Mazda CX-7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv