Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 422 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 51 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.9 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |