Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 34 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 34 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 67 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |