Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 288 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 78 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`352 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |