Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 21 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 10 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1598 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 107 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`329 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |