Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 34 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 986 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 332 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 591 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |