Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 44 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Captiva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 65 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |