Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 11 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 15 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1577 litres | 1380 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 27 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 197 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`878 kg | 1`784 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 627 kg | 516 kg | |
| Chevrolet Captiva load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Chevrolet Captiva is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |