Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 54 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 73 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |