Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 421 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1570 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 108 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 7 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |