Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 15 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1568 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 21 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |