Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 48 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
942 litres | 1455 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 513 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |