Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 15 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1568 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |