Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
942 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 18 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 513 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`377 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |