Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 27 HP more power than Ford Kuga, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 6.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 15 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
942 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Chevrolet Captiva has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 626 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`377 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |