Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |