Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Captiva version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Captiva 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 31 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1752 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 109 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |