Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 4 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`352 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |