Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 110 NM less than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 15 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1568 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 21 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`352 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |