Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 182 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 225 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Captiva version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Captiva 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 586 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | 1752 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 109 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 154 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |