Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 42 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 6.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |