Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 20 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 465 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 465 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 955 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 91 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |