Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 - 230 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 320 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 91 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`454 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |