Chevrolet Captiva 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 - 230 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 320 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 175 - 185 mm (6.9 - 7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
930 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`454 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`769 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 685 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Chevrolet Captiva load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Chevrolet Captiva is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |