Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Opel Antara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 258 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 217 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | 9.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.7 | 6.3 - 9.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Antara. On average, a Chevrolet Captiva with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Opel Antara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1420 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 57 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 157 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`424 | ~ 2`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Opel Antara has
| |