Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 258 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.7 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 34 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1513 litres | |
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 67 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 64 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`424 | ~ 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |