Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Opel Antara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 217 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.1 seconds | 9.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.5 | 6.3 - 9.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Antara. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | 1420 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Captiva has 57 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`430 | ~ 2`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Opel Antara has
| |