Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.1 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.5 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | 1792 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 294 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`430 | ~ 2`159 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |